Category: Cryptocurrency

A well-known Ethereum MEV bot called JaredFromSubway has been drained of approximately $7.5 million, according to security firm Blockaid. The incident did not involve a typical phishing attack or a direct vulnerability in the bot’s smart contract, but rather a clever manipulation of the bot’s automated approval system.

Blockaid explained that the attacker deployed specially crafted contracts that tricked JaredFromSubway’s automated trading system into granting token approvals. These approvals were initially used and revoked during test transactions, but the attacker later altered the route design so that the bot issued approvals that were never spent or revoked, leaving them open for exploitation.

The final exploit involved pulling WETH, USDC, and USDT from the bot’s contract using the open approvals via transferFrom. Etherscan data shows transfers from jaredfromsubway: MEV Bot 2 to an attacker wallet. Blockaid estimates the loss at around $7.5 million, but JaredFromSubway’s account later claimed the loss was $15 million and offered a $1 million bounty for the return of funds, with the discrepancy remaining unexplained.

The attack targeted the bot’s trading workflow. MEV bots monitor Ethereum for profitable transactions, and in this case, attacker-controlled contracts made a fake profitable route appear legitimate, leading the bot to approve spending rights. The attacker used 66 fake token contracts mimicking WETH, USDC, and USDT, paired with fake liquidity pools, to steer the bot into granting approvals that later enabled the drain.

JaredFromSubway is one of Ethereum’s most notorious sandwich bots, which places trades before and after a user’s swap to capture price spreads. It previously made headlines for targeting a swap by Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin in 2023 and consuming about 7% of Ethereum’s gas in a single day. This exploit highlights the risks of token approvals in automated systems and adds to ongoing debates about MEV and user protection on Ethereum.

In a landmark decision, a Japanese corporate pension fund has unveiled plans to incorporate cryptocurrency into its investment portfolio starting in the fiscal year 2026. The National Business Corporate Pension Fund, which services around 1,200 small and medium-sized enterprises in Okayama City and manages roughly 21.3 billion yen (approximately $136 million), intends to allocate 1% of its total assets to digital assets. This move is notable as it represents a rare foray into crypto by Japan’s retirement sector.

The fund aims to gain exposure through a passive multi-asset fund managed by a prominent hedge fund, which will hold a diversified basket of cryptocurrencies. The specific tokens and fund manager have not been disclosed. Importantly, the fund’s leadership frames this allocation not as a speculative bet on crypto prices but as a strategy for currency risk diversification. The fund’s current fiscal 2025 asset mix is heavily weighted toward the yen at 80%, with dollars at 15% and other currencies making up 5%. For fiscal 2026, the plan is to reduce yen exposure to 70%, increase developed-market currencies to 10%, and allocate 5% to emerging-market currencies, gold, and crypto. Investment executive director Aiyu Kiguchi reportedly expressed concerns that the dollar could lose its reserve currency status, explaining why the fund opted not to increase dollar holdings.

Kiguchi also noted that the decision followed six years of research, during which the fund observed that the crypto market had matured with a deeper investor base. Additionally, the fund is exploring strategies that utilize arbitrage across multiple crypto assets. The modest 1% allocation is deliberate, designed to provide exposure while limiting risk to the broader portfolio, especially given that defined benefit plans must safeguard retirement savings. The fund reportedly maintains a funded ratio above 140% and an effective equity ratio above 30%.

This development coincides with Japan’s evolving regulatory landscape for cryptocurrencies. In June 2025, Japan’s lower house passed a bill to reclassify crypto assets under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act rather than the Payment Services Act. This shift could pave the way for regulated crypto exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and a reduced tax rate, with a target 20% rate by 2028. Meanwhile, the Osaka Exchange, part of Japan Exchange Group, is considering launching Bitcoin futures in 2028 if spot Bitcoin ETFs become legal, aiming to meet institutional hedging demand. A ruling party panel has also urged Japan to establish a legal framework for crypto ETFs and promote yen stablecoins in Asia. These regulatory moves signal Japan’s intent to integrate crypto into regulated market channels.

The pension fund’s cautious step does not alter the inherent risk profile of crypto assets but demonstrates that some domestic institutions now view limited crypto exposure as a component of currency and portfolio management. This shift could inspire other Japanese institutional investors to explore similar strategies.

Two brothers from Texas have admitted to their roles in a federal robbery case where prosecutors say they abducted a Minnesota family and forced the transfer of over $8 million in cryptocurrency. Isiah Angelo Garcia and Raymond Christian Garcia pleaded guilty on Thursday to a charge of interference with commerce by robbery, which could result in a maximum of 20 years in prison. U.S. Attorney Daniel Rosen stated that the pleas hold the men accountable for their actions during the armed robbery.

According to court documents, the brothers traveled from Texas to Minnesota on September 19, 2025, to carry out the attack. The victims—a man, his wife, and their young son—were allegedly held at gunpoint for hours. While the wife and son were confined to the family home for about nine hours, the man was taken to a family cabin roughly three hours away, where he was forced to transfer the cryptocurrency from online accounts and hardware wallets. The case began to unravel when the victim’s son managed to call emergency services. Sheriff’s deputies later recovered a rifle and a shotgun, and surveillance footage helped tie the brothers to the crime. As part of their plea agreements, both men acknowledged that firearms were used to threaten the victims and have agreed to pay restitution of more than $8 million. Sentencing dates have not yet been announced.

This case comes amid a surge in physical attacks targeting cryptocurrency holders worldwide. Security firm CertiK reported in February that crypto-related kidnappings and assaults rose 75% in 2025 compared to the previous year, with losses estimated at $101 million in the first four months of 2026 alone. Earlier this month, another crypto kidnapping case resulted in a guilty plea in Connecticut, where a man admitted to conspiring to abduct the parents of a crypto millionaire linked to a theft of about 4,100 Bitcoin. In May, the wife of The Sandbox co-founder Sebastien Borget survived an attempted kidnapping at their home in France, where suspects posed as delivery workers. French authorities have launched a prevention platform as crypto-related kidnappings continue to climb, with officials reporting 41 such cases in the first four months of 2026—an average of one every 2.5 days.

Bitcoin surged more than 2 percent to reach $63,770 following a ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hezbollah that calmed market anxieties and contributed to an 8 percent weekly drop in oil prices. The cryptocurrency later settled near $63,600 after hitting an intraday high, reversing a 7 percent slide from the June 15 peak of $67,200 that was driven by ETF outflows, geopolitical tensions, and a shift away from risky assets.

Optimism returned after reports confirmed that Israel and Hezbollah would begin a ceasefire on Friday, with a U.S. official verifying the deal and Iranian leaders expressing willingness to resume diplomatic talks with Washington if the terms are upheld. This development reduced fears of an expanded regional conflict and pushed crude oil benchmarks Brent and WTI to multi-week lows, down roughly 8 percent for the week.

Safe-haven assets like gold and silver lost ground as investors moved capital into higher-risk opportunities, with gold falling 1.6 percent and silver dropping about 2 percent over the past day, coinciding with Bitcoin’s rebound from weekly lows.

Derivatives activity has amplified the recovery, with a large options expiry approaching—nearly $10.6 billion in Bitcoin options set to expire on June 26—adding to the upward momentum. Short sellers were forced to reduce positions after Bitcoin entered oversold territory following the June 18 selloff, a condition that often triggers short covering, which exerts additional upward pressure on price. Data from CoinGlass shows a significant liquidation cluster in the $64,000 to $65,000 range just above current levels, with another near $66,000, suggesting that a sustained rally could trigger further forced buying and increase volatility.

Institutional flows remain mixed, as U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded over $226 million in net outflows this week, extending a withdrawal trend since mid-May. However, the selling pace has slowed compared to prior weeks, offering some relief.

From a technical perspective, Bitcoin is trading within a symmetrical triangle on the four-hour chart, bounded by a descending resistance line from the June 15 high and a rising support line from the June 5 low. Price action has compressed toward the apex, often preceding a large directional move. A breakthrough above $64,760 would clear both triangle resistance and a major Fibonacci level, with the measured move target projecting toward $79,000 to $80,000. Daily momentum indicators are improving: the MACD histogram shows consecutive higher readings after a prolonged decline, the RSI has climbed from near-oversold territory back above 38, and Chaikin Money Flow, though still negative, is turning upward, indicating easing selling pressure.

The bullish scenario weakens if Bitcoin falls below the triangle’s ascending support and slips under $62,000. CoinGlass data shows heavy liquidity around $61,800 to $62,000, making that zone a key battleground. A breakdown below that could expose the June low near $59,200 and shift momentum back to bears.

Traders are also keeping an eye on U.S.-Iran negotiations, Federal Reserve policy signals, and ETF flows. Any renewed Middle East escalation, a rise in oil prices, or another wave of institutional selling could hinder Bitcoin’s recovery and delay a breakout attempt.

The Philippine Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is moving forward with its support for real-world asset tokenization, as four companies progress through its regulatory sandbox. SEC Commissioner Rogelio Quevedo stated that the regulator now believes current laws can accommodate tokenized assets, opening doors for new capital market activities.

Quevedo made these remarks during Philippine Blockchain Week, emphasizing that tokenization could transform how securities are issued and traded. The SEC’s StratBox sandbox allows firms to test innovative products under supervision, with participants including a tokenized real estate project and platforms offering access to US equities. BlockShoals Technologies has also received in-principle approval to test crypto services.

The SEC is leveraging artificial intelligence to clamp down on investment scams, partnering with platforms like Google and TikTok to remove illegal offerings. Meanwhile, the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas has tightened rules for virtual asset service providers, requiring thorough due diligence before listing cryptocurrencies. Both Binance and BlockShoals currently lack the necessary VASP license, according to the central bank.

Binance founder Changpeng Zhao has floated a controversial idea: freeze up to 1 million Bitcoin linked to Satoshi Nakamoto if those coins remain unmoved after a future switch to quantum-resistant cryptography. Speaking on the Galaxy Brains podcast on June 18, Zhao argued that quantum computing, while not an immediate threat, could eventually break Bitcoin’s current security. He believes the bigger challenge is coordinating a network-wide upgrade to quantum-resistant systems.

Zhao proposed a migration period of six to twelve months after implementing quantum-resistant cryptography. During this time, holders could transfer their coins to protected addresses. After the deadline, any remaining coins in legacy addresses should be frozen under the new protocol. He warned that leaving vulnerable addresses active could allow quantum-capable attackers to seize coins from defunct owners, creating an unfair redistribution of wealth.

Zhao emphasized that such a decision would require broad community consensus, not unilateral action. The proposal has sparked debate among Bitcoin developers and advocates, who remain divided over handling coins secured by older cryptographic standards. A recent Coinbase advisory board report urged Bitcoin to start preparing a migration path to post-quantum cryptography, suggesting a deadline for moving coins protected by ECDSA and Schnorr signatures. Supporters argue freezing unmigrated coins could prevent future attackers from acquiring large amounts of Bitcoin and destabilizing the market.

Critics, however, view freezing dormant coins as confiscation, conflicting with Bitcoin’s principles of immutability and user control. Galaxy Digital’s Alex Thorn, a vocal opponent, believes Satoshi’s coins should remain untouched regardless of technological advances. He argues that altering ownership rights could weaken Bitcoin’s credibility as a neutral monetary system. Thorn also noted that Satoshi’s stash is spread across 22,000 addresses, each containing about 50 BTC, making large-scale quantum attacks more difficult than assumed. He warned that some community members might prefer a severe market decline over protocol changes that override control of long-dormant wallets.

The CME Group, which dominates roughly 92% of U.S. exchange-traded derivatives, is facing sharp criticism over its recent legal challenge against the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Jake Chervinsky, head of the Hyperliquid Policy Center, argues that the suit is a blatant effort to stifle competition and protect the exchange’s monopoly. In a social media post, he described the lawsuit as a shocking mistake and an unnecessary aggression that reveals CME as a fearful incumbent rather than a market leader.

According to data from Better Markets cited by the Hyperliquid Policy Center, CME’s overwhelming market share leaves little room for competitors, resulting in higher costs and fewer choices for traders. Chervinsky contends that the lawsuit targets the CFTC’s approval of crypto perpetual futures, which represent the first innovative derivatives product to enter regulated U.S. markets in over a decade. He notes that American traders were previously forced to use offshore platforms for similar products, and now that compliant domestic options exist, CME is trying to close that door.

CME, however, argues that perpetual contracts should be classified as swaps under the Dodd-Frank Act, not futures. The exchange claims the CFTC bypassed proper rulemaking procedures when it approved these products on platforms like Coinbase and Kalshi. Outgoing CME CEO Terrence Duffy stated that the lawsuit is necessary to uphold the law. Meanwhile, the CFTC and SEC have launched a joint public consultation to clarify the definitions of swaps and related derivatives, a move that may address the broader ambiguities highlighted by this dispute.

The Hyperliquid Policy Center emphasizes that this isn’t just about one product—it’s about market access and fairness. Chervinsky warned that CME’s actions could harm innovation and keep U.S. markets less competitive. As the legal battle unfolds, the industry watches closely to see whether regulators will support new entrants or side with the established giant.

The recent upgrade of the XRP Ledger’s xrpld software to version 3.2.0 has led to a surge in bug reports, revealing synchronization failures, configuration errors, and networking issues. Despite these flaws, only 26% of network nodes have adopted the update, and no widespread network outages have been reported.

According to developer reports on the project’s GitHub repository, the most critical issue involves a node that remains stuck in a ‘connected’ state after upgrading, unable to synchronize with the ledger. Downgrading to version 3.1.3 resolved the problem. Another bug causes the server to crash when parsing configuration files with inline comments, due to a legacy parser that fails to handle certain fields correctly.

Additional problems have been identified in transaction relay calculations, which may reduce the number of peers receiving transactions. A separate flaw in the resource charging mechanism records only the highest fee, discarding earlier fee data. Validator list distribution is also affected, as information is only sent to inbound peers, excluding outbound connections.

Issues with consensus logic include a potential unsigned integer overflow risk in ledger sequence validation and inconsistent transaction routing flags. Broken proposal node identifiers tied to ephemeral keys have also been reported. In ledger tracking, logic gaps could leave nodes in an indeterminate state for extended periods.

Project maintainers have confirmed several bugs and assigned them for review. The XRP Ledger Foundation continues to investigate, but so far, no network-wide disruption has occurred.

Strategy co-founder Michael Saylor has pushed back against critics following a sharp decline in the company’s STRC preferred stock, which dropped below its $100 par value and sparked allegations of fraudulent practices. In a June 20 post on X, Saylor emphasized that Strategy’s Bitcoin and cash reserves currently exceed its outstanding debt by roughly $48 billion. He highlighted that since 2022, the firm has raised over $60 billion in additional capital, channeling those funds into Bitcoin purchases.

To contrast the current situation with previous challenges, Saylor recalled the 2022 crypto bear market when Strategy held about 130,000 Bitcoin valued at around $2.6 billion while Bitcoin traded near $20,000. After the cryptocurrency fell below $16,000, the company’s debt temporarily surpassed the combined value of its Bitcoin and cash reserves by approximately $300 million. During that period, MSTR stock dropped from approximately $24 to the $13 range on a split-adjusted basis.

Saylor stated, “We stayed focused, strengthened the company, and executed our strategy. Since then, Strategy has raised over $60 billion of additional capital and invested it in Bitcoin, adding more than 716,000 BTC.”

The comments come as investors debate the sustainability of Strategy’s financing model following STRC’s recent decline. Bitcoin critic Peter Schiff escalated concerns by suggesting investors could pursue legal action against Strategy and Saylor, arguing that Saylor may have violated SEC marketing rules in promoting the preferred stock offering.

Some market observers propose selling Bitcoin as a potential fix. Arca Chief Investment Officer Jeff Dorman suggested the company might need to sell between $3 billion and $4 billion worth of Bitcoin to reduce pressure on its capital structure and support STRC holders. While Dorman assigned a 25% probability to that outcome, his base-case scenario (70% probability) involves Strategy continuing to sell small amounts of MSTR stock, leaving Bitcoin holdings largely intact but potentially causing additional downside for common shareholders.

Despite intensifying criticism, several Bitcoin advocates have defended Saylor and Strategy. Fox and Sky News contributor David Gokhshtein argued that Bitcoin’s current market value cannot be attributed to a single individual, criticizing efforts to blame Saylor for broader market movements and dismissing comparisons between Strategy and the collapsed Terra ecosystem. Bitcoin advocate Samson Mow described STRC as a “brilliant instrument” and stated that he sees no structural flaw unless investors believe Bitcoin will fail to appreciate over the long term.

Separate liquidity concerns have emerged, with market maker QCP estimating that Strategy’s available resources could cover preferred dividend obligations for roughly seven and a half months. QCP added that if existing financing channels become less attractive, alternative funding options—including Bitcoin sales—may eventually be required.

Bio Protocol has unveiled OpenLabs, a comprehensive platform that merges AI-assisted research development, community crowdfunding, and on-chain governance. This move aims to bypass traditional grant gatekeepers, offering a streamlined alternative for scientific projects. The protocol’s ecosystem has already raised over $33 million through its BIO Genesis initiative.

Announced on June 19 during DeSci.Berlin 2026, OpenLabs allows researchers to develop ideas, collaborate with contributors, and secure funding within a single interface. Instead of navigating separate grant applications, governance platforms, and collaboration tools, users can leverage AI-driven workflows to refine their proposals and seek community approval through token-holder voting.

Bio Protocol emphasizes that this model replaces lengthy review cycles and institutional oversight common in traditional funding. Community members vote on research proposals, with BIO tokens serving as the governance and utility asset. The platform also integrates AI to assist in developing and polishing projects.

Two initial projects highlighted are RheumaAI, an AI agent for rheumatology research, and PeptAI, focused on peptide discovery. OpenLabs builds on Bio Protocol’s broader decentralized science strategy, which includes tokenized intellectual property and BioDAOs to direct funds toward biotechnology and scientific research.

Earlier efforts include the August 2025 launch of Aubrai, a decentralized BioAgent developed with VitaDAO for longevity research. Aubrai functions as an on-chain AI co-scientist, generating hypotheses and aiding in lab experiment design. Despite these advances, the BIO token has seen an 8% decline in the past 24 hours, reflecting broader market pressures and uncertainty around federal policies.

While decentralized science offers transparent funding and community participation, regulatory challenges remain. Tokenized IP in biotechnology intersects with securities laws, patent frameworks, and pharmaceutical oversight, which could complicate compliance as projects mature.