Human rights attorney Maduabuchi Idam has launched a scathing critique of ADC chieftain Kenneth Okonkwo, accusing him of sacrificing logical thinking for verbal eloquence. Idam’s remarks follow Okonkwo’s rejection of the Atiku-Amaechi presidential ticket, which he opposed due to the selection of a running mate from the South-South rather than the Southeast.
In a pointed statement, Idam suggested that Okonkwo’s vocal opposition might stem from personal ambition rather than genuine regional advocacy. He hinted that Okonkwo may have envisioned himself as Atiku’s running mate, a notion Idam dismissed as unrealistic given Okonkwo’s limited electoral appeal. Idam argued that a politician who cannot attract votes beyond his immediate circle is hardly a valuable asset for a major presidential bid.
The lawyer also speculated that Okonkwo’s next political move could be toward the APC, alleging that his recent stance aligns more closely with that party’s interests. Furthermore, Idam referenced a rumor that Okonkwo’s fallout with Peter Obi occurred because the NDC candidate failed to provide a duplex he desired. Idam used this to question the depth of Okonkwo’s political convictions, suggesting that loyalty can be bought with material incentives.
Concluding his critique, Idam warned the public to watch for a potential party switch by Okonkwo, asserting that his sharp tongue could easily be used to deny past statements. Idam emphasized that true political principles are tested when comfort is not guaranteed.